The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

Post your HP#'s with a 190 fuel pump.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

JayRolla

15+ Year Contributor
5,629
34
Feb 23, 2006
Colorado Spring, Colorado
Just want to see what people have layed down with the 190 walboro. Im planning on getting a pump and my goal is no more than 350whp. Is this # possible with a 190, 550's with some meth injection?
 
haven't had my car on a dyno, but according to this with a trap speed of 105 and a 13.1 ET I have about 290HP at the crank 250ish at the front wheels running a warblo 190.
This probably won't help you much but atleast it will get your thread started :)
 
The pump should be sized to the injectors. If it can hold pressure with 550's at 100% IDC (I believe it can), then whatever power you're making doesn't really matter.
 
well from what ive researched its well over 350whp. I still have not had anyone tell me when it actually becomes a bottle neck in hp. I do know that it will take what ever my 16g can through at it.
 
CanadianTSi said:
Whatever 45lbs/min of airflow nets you on that particular dyno...

Again, an excellent post by Tyler. Fuel pumps and injectors should be sized for airflow, not boost pressure or HP. Although, you can get a ballpark correleation between airflow and HP, your best bet is to deal with airflow only. Then you are in the safe zone and whatever your dyno numbers are, is what they are. :thumb:

I'm making a whopping 242.5HP on a 190 Walboro. :tease: My excuse is, that I'm still running the stock catback.
 
spyderturbo007 said:
Again, an excellent post by Tyler. Fuel pumps and injectors should be sized for airflow, not boost pressure or HP. Although, you can get a ballpark correleation between airflow and HP, your best bet is to deal with airflow only. Then you are in the safe zone and whatever your dyno numbers are, is what they are. :thumb:

I'm making a whopping 242.5HP on a 190 Walboro. :tease: My excuse is, that I'm still running the stock catback.




Your not alone, Nathan. Your not alone.
 
Im just asking so I can see what people have layed down. Ive seen all the flow charts and everything. I wanted some real power numbers. I really want someone to come on here and say they dynoed so and so and ran out of fuel at about this much boost/power. Ive found that the 190 should beable to handle anything the 16g can put out, but others said they have ran out of fuel. But if you go by the flow charts that cant happen since the 190 can handle more airflow than what the 16g is capable of.

spyderturbo007 said:
I'm making a whopping 242.5HP on a 190 Walboro. My excuse is, that I'm still running the stock catback.

Not bad on a small exhuast, you should still beable to get more out of it.
 
JayRolla said:
Not bad on a small exhuast, you should still beable to get more out of it.

That was at 17psi of boost on a stock UICP. Since then I've upped the boost to 20psi and I'm running RRE's UICP. Just the UICP along with the boost increase netted me almost a 4lbs/min increase in airflow. :sneaky:

Too bad I can't find a high flowing exhaust that sounds like stock. :(
 
Upping the boost added a little of power, but the UICP does nothing. I noticed nothing with mine and buschur did a dyno test and proved that the UICP adds no horsepower at all. Nothing.

Too bad I can't find a high flowing exhaust that sounds like stock.

If you go 2.5" with a highflow cat, resonator and a muffler than it will sound real good. Not like stock but better than most other exhausts. The resonator really helps keep the tone down.
 
JayRolla said:
Upping the boost added a little of power, but the UICP does nothing. I noticed nothing with mine and buschur did a dyno test and proved that the UICP adds no horsepower at all. Nothing.

I highly disagree. When you say you "noticed" are you talking about the butt dyno or some other way? Take a look at my review of the UICP:

http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/showthread.php?t=196116

I was able to gain 1.76lbs/min of airflow following the addition of the UICP prior to any increase in boost pressure.
 
Yea buschur also seen a increase in airflow, but the dyno didnt show any increase in power. Email buschur and ask them if the UICP gives you power. They proved it dont. And yes my but dyno felt nothing.
 
JayRolla said:
Yea buschur also seen a increase in airflow, but the dyno didnt show any increase in power. Email buschur and ask them if the UICP gives you power. They proved it dont. And yes my but dyno felt nothing.

I'm confused....:confused:

Airflow is power, otherwise what is the point of getting a bigger turbo??

Can you post a link to the dyno test that Buchur did because this is what I copied from their website:

Intercooler Pipe Upgrade
The Buschur Racing Upper I/C pipe replaces the stock rubber and metal piping setup with a mandrel-bent, polished stainless steel pipe. The stock Throttle Body elbow is replaced with a larger, better-flowing elbow as well.

Typical gains are 7-10 hp with this part. Kit includes all hose connectors, and will not blow off


Found here:

http://www.buschurracing.com/dsm-stage2.htm
 
Its funny because of your write up spyder I bought my UICP upgrade. Now im saying its not much of an upgrade. I cant find the link for the life of me but there was a shop(buschur??) that did a dyno test on a 300hp DSM. With the UICP installed it had a zero increase in torque or hp.

I guess in certain setups it can add power like in your case, where is deffinently an increase in air flow. I was originally trying to say thats not where you bottle neck is, either is the exhuast. I bet you can get 280whp if you upgraded to a FMIC or meth injection.
 
i bet my 3 inch piping made a difference. It seems to me with 3inch cold side and 2.5 hot side and an hks tb elbow that it's floing a ton better than stock. If its pulling more air through u have to me be making more power even if its not alot.
 
Im guessing no more than 1-2hp if it does add any. I emailed Nick at buschur and here is what he said.


Jason,

I do not have a link to it. It is correct as the upper piping really does not net a lot of horsepower. It is more for faster throttle response and better reliability, as well as aesthetics.

Nick
Buschur Racing Inc.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jason Roe
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 4:12 PM
Subject: UICP


Hey Nick just a quick question if you can take the time to answer it. A while back I read an article on your website about a dyno test you guys did on an UICP. It was like a 300hp car or something but after the UICP install it neted zero HP gain. Do you remember this and have a link to it if you do. Thanks.

Regards,
Jason Roe
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Latest Classifieds

  • For sale 2g 2G Power Window Switches ( tested and hardware included )
    2G Power Window Switches $55 + shipping and paypal fees* Tested 6/2/26 * Hardware included *...
    • jersygsx
    • Updated:
    • Expires
  • For sale VIRGIN 4G63 6-BOLT TURBO HEAD
    Came off a virgin stock AWD Auto 1G DMS (91), also have matching block and crank which are also...
    • The_Partout_Spot
    • Updated:
    • Expires
  • For sale 1G DSM 4G63 6-BOLT TIMING COVER
    Used, see condition in photos. Buyer covers shipping / fees.
    • The_Partout_Spot
    • Updated:
    • Expires
  • For sale Garage clean out
    Changing setups on the car and getting rid of some stuff as well that's been laying around. Will...
    • 92GSXtacy
    • Updated:
    • Expires
  • For sale 4G63 Griffin intercooler cores
    Griffin intercooler cores. Top to bottom flow. High cfm and heat transfer. 24x8x2.75 and...
    • Galant665
    • Updated:
Back
Top